1 maja 2016
Artykuł po angielsku przedstawiający częsć badań poświęconych technikom władania szablą husarską.
Polish Hussar Saber
Specific design, unspecific system?
Could one find any more Polish weapon than the Hussar szabla? Literally, whether someone thinks of a saber from Poland, he probably means this very specific weapon, that is (not fully accurately) accounted to the famous winged hussars. It is katana of the eastern Europe, often considered by many modern usersto be one of the most efficient battle weapons of all.
It is naturally a belief based on pop culture, yet there are no doubts that the weapon was, and still is, very magnificent. Although, in contrary to many weapons of other countries, we have no direct accounts about its use.
Would people design such a complicated type of weapon and never use all of its constructional feats to their advantage? The answer is quite obvious. Yet to find out exact method is not so easy. This article was created to analyze the possible sources and methods that would allow the reader tosolve that problem.
First and easiest step is to look at the structure of the weapon itself.As you can see on the picture below , the typical hussar szabla consists of a blade, specific almost straight handle, closed knuckle-guard and a heart shaped thumbring.
Picture nr 1: Hussar szabla of the 2nd half of the XVIIth century.
Author of the picture is Andrzej Mikiciak. Weapon was forged by Andrzej Mikiciak.
For the sake of analysis we must note, that the blades were often taken from many other sabers both earlier and foreign, so we cannot focus on this part of the weapon1.
Handle, in contrary to the earlier types of szablas is very straight, only bent slightly at the end. While the earlier anatomically curved handles promoted a very high surface of the grip, here we cannotuse similar grip. This is the first difference which does not allow us to efficiently utilize techniques of the earlier types of weapons in the same fashion..
Fig.1: Hussar szabla (nr 1) and the earlier Polish-Hungarian szabla type(nr2). Notice the angles of the knuckleguards, and the level on which the thumbring is placed in contrary to the crossguard position.
Picture from the W. Zabłocki book “Cięcia Prawdziwa Szablą”
The thumbring is again different than those in the earlier types of szablas. It is heart shaped, positioned underneath the crossguard level and is far wider than those of its predecessors. Knuckleguard seems a direct descendant of the earlier half-closed models or it may be as well coming from the chained models as was indicated by Cz. Jarnuszkewicz2 .
There is one contemporary source speaking about sabers (A coltelaccio is presented in the pictures of the source) from the period when the hussar szablas were in broad use. It is Francesco Antonio Marcellis Delle Regole Della Scherma3 from 1686. It describes a way to deal against a saber with a sword and vice versa.
We can read there: “In order to have the necessary speed, for such feints, one must remember the universal rule regarding cuts: they are to be delivered with the wrist only, without moving the whole arm ,or they become wide and slow movements.”4
What is more:
“Single time actions, which are so important with the sword, are very dangerous with the sabre, because, being this a weapon that hurts with the edge only, it is not the case that it can hit the opponent with the edge and set aside his point, in a single time: the first action doesn’t have in itself the second, the defence, so you cannot offend in single time.”5
What we can find outis that most actions with the saber should be performed with swift use of the wrist while retaining a continuous repetition of actions. The only fencing action that comes to mind is a moulinet.
It is even more accurate once we reach for earlier but more distant sources. Matrakci Nasuh6, a Bosnian Janissary wrote his treatise in Ottoman about the use of the Turkish bow, kilij and battletactics. He as well designed sparring methods for Janissary to practice their martial art- Matrak and Tomak Sporru.While Matrak is designed to be performed with stick and leather singlesticks, Tomak is a very interesting creation. It is a leather ball placed on a thin rope. The idea of the practice is to hit your opponent in the back with the ball. This makes a good szabla mechanics practice. It is even more interesting once we take a closer look at the most often used technique. It is done by performing a circular whirlwind like movements with our ball to hit the opponents back.
Fig. 2: XIXth century illustration depicting men playing Tomak. Notice different ways of gripping the thread.
Picture from the book about Ottoman Turks by Franz Taeschner.
How then should we perform a moulinet with a Hussar Szabla? Later sources introduce us to methods to perform a moulinet with a weapon. There are generally two types of those actions that can be found thoroughly explained in those sources.
First one is: Rules and Regulation for Sword exercise of the Cavarly by John le Machant7. The book introduces us to a moulinet that can be very often seen in western saber systems. The moulinet is performed through opening the hand and letting the weapons blade fall down and then through closing of the hand a leverage is put to the handle and a strike is performed.
Fig. 3: An illustrations from the Le Marchant Regulations8
The second source is Theorie sur l’escrime a cheval9 written by Alexander Muller, a French cavalry treatise. Muller on the contrary shows a very firm but extremely maneuverable grip that allows for good rotation of the wrist. The strike is performed by simple rotation of the wrist sometimes with aid of elbow.
Fig. 4: Two plates (3 and 10) from the Mullers book10 presenting the method of the moulinet10
Both moulinets can be very efficient and if properly managed may be used with the Hussar szabla effectively. Yet they differ in the aspect of durability. Le Machants moulinet is rather a sudden single striking action that allows for sudden change of direction, while Mullers moulinet allows for great speed of multiple strikes and a sudden changes in motion.
What is more, Muller grip directly matches the slight bending of the handle of hussar szabla. The firm grip allows for actions that are easily matched with the Tomak maneuvers. As well the knuckleguardas according to the Jarnuszkiewicz suggestion11 was created based on the chain guards, which were, as Kwaśniewicz indicates12 a form of swordknots.
Fig. 5: An illustration from Jarnuszkiewicz book13 presenting the evolution of the hussar szabla.
Considering the fact, that it was the basic strike that could be performed with this szabla, an importantquestion arises: why would Poles develop such a complicated thumbring? Especially when it is far more protective and decorative than the earlier models.
Answer to that query may be found within its anatomy. The thumbring is positioned well beneath the crossguard, which allows for very easy swap of the grip to a shallow sword grip, which allows for a great surface of the grasp and a far better stopping power. This allows to support the fencing action with majority of earlier techniques without disrupting the Muller moulinet potential.
This type of grip gives us opportunity to deliver a stabile cuts , that allows us to what Marcelli stated:“the first action doesn’t have in itself the second, the defence, so you cannot offend in single time.” 5 Enabling the user to enforce an exchange with enemy while retaining the ability to suddenly swap to moulinets or thrusts14.
The aspect of stance is far more problematic, as it may be even more diverse. Marcelli presents us the footwork according to the method of use against the sword armed enemy.
“Footwork must support the cut, giving it more power and strength, but it must always be fit to the natural movement of the strike. You can step forward and backward, to the left or to the right, but always making short steps, with body upright and well centred (between the feet).”15Here we have the typical Italian style of movement, which is strongly based on ground, mostly utilizing the 90 degree foot angle. It must be stated here, that to effectively perform cuts the stance must be non linear. Yet we have no information about the stance once we meet a cutting weapon such as another szabla.
Earlier systems present us with the German longsword method of footwork16 , which may be a good cooperation with the thumbring grip. They allow for better close-up distances and are well presented by Marcelli3 when he explains the ways to get to wrestling with szabla.
fig 6. An illustration from the Marcelli book3, probably made by his uncle, who served in Poland for some time, thus came Francesco knowledge about the weapon.
An interesting proposition would be to use the French stance17. Especially regarding the fact, that they used a weapon that may be a direct descendant of the hussar szabla18.The foot position is like the Italian stance, but wider, allowing for better torso and hip rotation and using a different, smaller angle. An example is presented beneath in the book by Eugene Chaperon17.
Fig 7. Presenting the training of cavalry unit in the art of saber fencing, by Eugene Chaperon17. Notice the way they stand, positioning the mass center in the middle while retaining partially frontal position.
Beneath are presented the footwork diagrams for each of the supposed stances that could be used for the Hussar szabla system.
Marcelli stance allows for great forward/ backward mobility, short lunges and quick short steps are very natural.It is very good for stabile moulinet actions and thrusts, which makes it a great deal against thrusting type weapons, as it is stated in the Marcelli treatise. Similar situation can be observed in Micheal Hundt21 treatise, where he explains how to cope against rapier.
Eugene Chaperon gives a greater diagonal mobility and more torso and hip freedom of movement, which gives better defense and stronger cuts, but still allows a good forward yet little less backward pace. It is due to the fact, that they were joiningthe tradition of French smallsword and heavy saber, that is most probably a descendant of the Polish and Hungarian szablas.
Marozzo position gives you the most freedom of movement, being good in most of the cuts, moulinets, but giving less stability of the steps, though being good base for swapping to the other stances.
Paulus Hector Mair foot position is the least maneuverable with short steps, but gives a great potential to get into complicated short distance techniques, grappling and many others . As it have been shown, there are three possible ways of putting the rear leg in that stance,which improves, control and stability at the cost of the hip freedom. This stance gives the most diverse possibilities of actions, yet in longer distance may be promoting single-time actions, which are not preferred by Marcelli.
In this aspect Marcelli4, our main source, explains that once we are met with the smallsword (or rapier) armed person, we should perform moulinets in front of ourselves, keeping a tight defense against eventual thrusts and enable us to catch the enemy blade with one of our cuts. Yet he presents us with no clue against a szabla armed person.
Though in his treatise we can read that it was his predecessors that were focused on the cut, and they did want to defend from the cut, as the main attack of the enemy. When he speaks of them, herefers to Achille Marozzo and his cutting diagram. In his works, Opera Nova, Marozzo explains many cutting guards, which are the more interesting as they are directly connected to typically cutting weapons such as Dussacks. Underneath are presented two examples of such common guards of the Paulus Hector Mair16 and Achille Marozzo19.
fig. Fig.8 Two figures from the earlier treatises. Achille Marozzo Opera Nova19 and Paulus Hector Mair16.It may be an interesting clue to use those techniques with the Polish Szabla.
In this aspect we can again reach for Marcelli help. As he explains in his text, we should never perform a single time attacks4, so that we will never get out of balance if our strike misses the target, it is important to clear off theopponents blade and get close to enemy to perform another attack or “get to wrestling”15. As Marcelli suggests this weapon “can hurt with every part of its blade” so cut made at short distance are very efficient and dangerous for the enemy. To make them properly done with moulinets we must utilize the off-hand, often grabbing the opponents armed hand.
Typical way to use the moulinets allows you to perform a series of strikes. This technique is based on the existence of the specific construction of the kuckleguard. It gives you an opportunity to perform a quite efficient and quick cut to the opponents hands while he performs strikes or other fencing actions.
Third possibility is the use of the thumbring. Thumbring based techniques allows you to strike hard with stabile cuts performed to ensure enemy response, which can be a very good actions against both heavier blades and other cutting attacks.
The hussar szabla gives us a diversity of possible actions, as its anatomy joins both Polish, Oriental and Western systems. There is no direct way to tell which actions were most often utilized, yet many of them have been transferred within different fencing systems.
This is naturally a supposed way to interpret given sources, and author has no intention to put the dot, as there might be many more sources which may indicate more clearly the ways to proficiently utilize this magnificent weapon.
NOTICE! For the sake of the fact that there were couple of hussar formations in our history, the article will be using the Polish word for saber writing hussar szabla instead of Polish hussar saber or Polish winged lancers saber.
1.Kwaśniewicz Włodzimierz, Dzieje szabli w Polsce,Warszawa 1993, p. 53 – 74
2.Kwaśniewicz Włodzimierz, Szabla Polska, od XV do końca XVIII wieku, Zielona Góra 1988, page 74
3.Marcelli Francesco Antonio , Delle regole della Scherma, 1686 Italy, scans from Raymond J. Lord collection.
4.Marcelli Francesco Antonio, Delle regole della Scherma, 1686 Italy, p. 101 -102, translation by Carlo Parisi
5.Marcelli Francesco Antonio , Delle regole della Scherma, 1686 Italy, p. 103, translation by Carlo Parisi
6.Nasuh bin Karagöz bin Abdullah el-Bosnavî, Tuhfet-ul Guzat,Istanbul Buyuksehir Belediyesi
7.Marchant John Gaspard le, Rules and regulations for the sword exercise for the cavalry, Whitehall 1796, scans by Will Mathieson
8.Marchant John Gaspard le, Rules and regulations for the sword exercise for the cavalry, Whitehall 1796,plates p. 15 – 17, scans by Will Mathieson
9.Muller Alexander, Theorie sur L’escrime a cheval, pour se defender avec avantage contre toute espece d’armes blanche, 1816 Paris, scans from Gallica Biblioteque Numerique
10.Muller Alexander, Theorie sur L’escrime a cheval, pour se defender avec avantage contre toute espece d’armes blanche, 1816 Paris, plate 3 and plate 10, scans from Gallica Biblioteque Numerique
11.Jarnuszkiewicz Czesław, Szabla wschodnia I jej typy narodowe, London 1973, p 59
12.Kwaśniewicz Włodzimierz, Dzieje szabli w Polsce,Warszawa 1993,p. 62
13.Jarnuszkiewicz Czesław, Szabla wschodnia I jej typy narodowe, London 1973,
14.It is good to mention here a thrusting type of gripping in the modern Polish cavalry regulations, REGULAMIN KAWALERII cz.IV 1933r. which presents us this picture, where we can see a clear analogy to the Muller moulinet.
15.Marcelli Francesco Antonio , Delle regole della Scherma, 1686 Italy, p. 104, translation by Carlo Parisi
16.Paulus hector Mair, Opus Amplissimum de Arte Athletica, Knight and Hunt, 2008
17.Chaperon Eugene, La science des armes dans lescavalerie, France
18.This is can be seen among different books, e. g. S Meyers Typology of sabers:
19.Marozzo Achille,Opera Nova,1536, scans from Raymond J. Lord Collection
20.Micheal Hundt, Ein new Kůnstliches Fechtbuch im Rappier,1611, scans from the sources of www.wiktenauer.com